vs
5.5Noise control & calls9.2
Why is TAK4200 better than TruSound ANC Neckband Earbuds?
- Battery life45 h vs 28 h+61%
Why is TruSound ANC Neckband Earbuds better than TAK4200?
- Active noise cancellingNo · TAK4200: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 32 mm | — |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 85 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 45 h | 28 h |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 129 g | — |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips TAK2000vsPhilips TAK4200
vs
Philips TAK4200vsJBL TUNE 530BT
vs
Philips TAK4200vsMoondrop Space Travel 2
vs
Philips TAK4200vsBelkin SoundForm Mini 2 AUD012fq
vs
Moondrop Space Travel 2vsVerbatim TruSound ANC Neckband Earbuds
vs
Soundcore C40i Open-Ear Clip-On Kopfhörer kabellos, GraphitgrauvsVerbatim TruSound ANC Neckband Earbuds
