vs
7.1Battery9.2
Why is Clam Junior better than TUNE 530BT?
Clam Junior has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TUNE 530BT better than Clam Junior?
- Battery life60 h vs 76 h+27%
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 33 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 30 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 85 dB | 102 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 60 h | 76 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 40 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 152 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
