Why is PORTA better than TAH3209?
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is TAH3209 better than PORTA?
- Battery life8 h vs 25 h3.1×
- Weight40 g vs 13 g3.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 112 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 25 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 600 mAh |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 40 g | 13 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
