Why is KDT3000 better than RB-F10D?
- Battery life8.5 h vs 7 h+21%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2.5 h+67%
Why is RB-F10D better than KDT3000?
RB-F10D has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8.5 h | 7 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 8.7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
