How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. EH11 FIO-EH11 vs Tune 520BT2

FiiO EH11 FIO-EH11 vs JBL Tune 520BT2

What EH11 FIO-EH11 does better (4) and where Tune 520BT2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

FiiO EH11 FIO-EH11
FiiO · 2026EH11 FIO-EH11
5.9Score
4 advantages≈ $45
vs
JBL Tune 520BT2
JBL · 2026Tune 520BT2
6.8Score
1 advantage≈ $40
Higher score
4.7Battery8.5

Why is EH11 FIO-EH11 better than Tune 520BT2?

  1. Weight92 g vs 158 g+72%
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  3. Driver size40 mm vs 33 mm+21%
  4. Lowest frequency17 Hz vs 20 Hz+18%

Why is Tune 520BT2 better than EH11 FIO-EH11?

  1. Battery life30 h vs 76 h2.5×
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 520BT2JBL Tune 520BT2≈ $406.8
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup designSemi-openClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm33 mm
Lowest frequency17 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω30 Ω
Sensitivity—101 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Microphones—4
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life30 h76 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—5 min → 5 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version66
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight92 g158 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare