How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Style 3 Bluetooth vs TAK4206

Energy Sistem Style 3 Bluetooth vs Philips TAK4206

What Style 3 Bluetooth does better (1) and where TAK4206 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Energy Sistem Style 3 Bluetooth
Energy Sistem · 2022Style 3 Bluetooth
4.1Score
1 advantage≈ $30
vs
Philips TAK4206
Philips · 2021TAK4206
4.2Score
1 advantage≈ $25
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
4.1Battery4.2

Why is Style 3 Bluetooth better than TAK4206?

  1. Driver size40 mm vs 32 mm+25%

Why is TAK4206 better than Style 3 Bluetooth?

  1. Battery life25 h vs 28 h+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAK4206Philips TAK4206≈ $254.2
Sound
FitOver-ear—
Driver size40 mm32 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—83 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life25 h28 h
Battery capacity400 mAh—
Charging time2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare