Why is LBT-TWS17 better than QCY-HT01C?
- Battery life5.5 h vs 5 h+10%
- Driver size14.2 mm vs 7 mm2×
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5.1+4%
- Earbud weight (each)3.3 g vs 5.2 g+58%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is QCY-HT01C better than LBT-TWS17?
QCY-HT01C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Semi-in-ear (open) | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Semi-open | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 14.2 mm | 7 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5.5 h | 5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 4 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 3.3 g | 5.2 g |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
