2.9Battery4.1
Why is LBT-TWS16CS better than FW1 FIO-FW1?
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
- Earbud weight (each)3.6 g vs 4.3 g+19%
Why is FW1 FIO-FW1 better than LBT-TWS16CS?
- Battery life5 h vs 7 h+40%
- aptXNo · LBT-TWS16CS: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Balanced armature |
| Driver size | 8 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 7 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 3.6 g | 4.3 g |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
