vs
7.2Noise control & calls3.0
3.8Battery2.3
Why is LBT-TWS13 better than Wave 200TWS?
- Active noise cancellingYes · Wave 200TWS: No
- Battery life6 h vs 5 h+20%
- Earbud weight (each)3.5 g vs 8.7 g2.5×
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
- Driver size10 mm vs 8 mm+25%
Why is Wave 200TWS better than LBT-TWS13?
Wave 200TWS has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 8 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 5 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 20 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 3.5 g | 8.7 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX2 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
