2.4Battery4.1
Why is LBT-TWS11 better than FW1 FIO-FW1?
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
- Earbud weight (each)3.4 g vs 4.3 g+26%
Why is FW1 FIO-FW1 better than LBT-TWS11?
- Battery life4 h vs 7 h+75%
- aptXNo · LBT-TWS11: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Semi-in-ear (open) | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Semi-open | — |
| Driver type | — | Balanced armature |
| Driver size | 14 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | 7 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 3.4 g | 4.3 g |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
