How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. LBT-OWS03 vs TAQ2000

Elecom LBT-OWS03 vs Philips TAQ2000

What LBT-OWS03 does better (2) and where TAQ2000 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Elecom LBT-OWS03
Elecom · 2025LBT-OWS03
4.1Score
2 advantages≈ $25
vs
Philips TAQ2000
Philips · 2025TAQ2000
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ $30
Higher score
2.9Battery4.5
4.4Build & features5.2

Why is LBT-OWS03 better than TAQ2000?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 100 Hz5×
  2. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is TAQ2000 better than LBT-OWS03?

  1. Battery life5 h vs 7 h+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAQ2000Philips TAQ2000≈ $304.3
Sound
FitOpen-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backOpen-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz100 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—113 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life5 h7 h
Total with charging case—28 h
Battery capacity—51 mAh
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight—48 g
Earbud weight (each)5.3 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare