Why is LBT-OWS01 better than TAE1209BK/00?
- Battery life10 h vs 8 h+25%
- Driver size16 mm vs 8.6 mm+86%
Why is TAE1209BK/00 better than LBT-OWS01?
TAE1209BK/00 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver size | 16 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 102 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 9.8 g | — |
| Protection rating | — | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Colours | — | White, Black |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
