Why is AMA92003 better than LBT-TWS17?
AMA92003 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is LBT-TWS17 better than AMA92003?
- Battery life5 h vs 5.5 h+10%
- Driver size8 mm vs 14.2 mm+77%
- Earbud weight (each)3.6 g vs 3.3 g+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Semi-in-ear (open) |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Semi-open |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 8 mm | 14.2 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 5.5 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 3.6 g | 3.3 g |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
