vs
9.3Noise control & calls7.2
Why is TWS STAX S10 ANC planar better than GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T?
- Driver size12 mm vs 10 mm+20%
Why is GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T better than TWS STAX S10 ANC planar?
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Planar magnetic | MEMS |
| Driver size | 12 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Sensitivity | 92 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 14.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 18 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, LHDC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 6.7 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100vsEdifier TWS STAX S10 ANC planar
vsBose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)vsEdifier TWS STAX S10 ANC planar
vsBeats Powerbeats Pro 2vsEdifier TWS STAX S10 ANC planar
vsfinal TONALITEvsEdifier TWS STAX S10 ANC planar
vsNoble Audio FoKus Rex5vsEdifier TWS STAX S10 ANC planar
vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsCasio earU ER-100PT8.07.8