Dimensions
Size comparison
ED-M90X20
| ED-M90 | X20 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 212 mm | 300 mm | −88 mm |
| Width | 133 mm | 530 mm | −397 mm |
| Depth | 225 mm | 245 mm | −20 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ED-M90 better than X20?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · X20: No
- LDACYes · X20: No
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is X20 better than ED-M90?
- Output power100 W vs 200 W2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver size | 101.6 mm | — |
| Output power | 100 W | 200 W |
| Speaker channels | Stereo | — |
| Lowest frequency | 50 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 24 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 30,000 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Mains powered | Yes | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | Yes | — |
| Optical input | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 6,050 g | — |
| Width | 133 mm | 530 mm |
| Height | 212 mm | 300 mm |
| Depth | 225 mm | 245 mm |
| Protection rating | — | IPX7 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Controls | Regional Distributors | — |
| Party / stereo pairing | — | Yes |
