vs
9.6Sound9.7
9.7Connectivity8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
M90Fidelio TAFA3/10
| M90 | Fidelio TAFA3/10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 212 mm | 303 mm | −91 mm |
| Width | 133 mm | 170 mm | −37 mm |
| Depth | 225 mm | 211 mm | +14 mm |
| Weight | 6,050 g | 3,399 g | +2,651 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M90 better than Fidelio TAFA3/10?
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is Fidelio TAFA3/10 better than M90?
- Weight6,050 g vs 3,399 g+78%
- Lowest frequency50 Hz vs 40 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver size | 101.6 mm | — |
| Output power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Lowest frequency | 50 Hz | 40 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, SBC | LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| Auracast | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | Yes | — |
| Optical input | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 6,050 g | 3,399 g |
| Width | 133 mm | 170 mm |
| Height | 212 mm | 303 mm |
| Depth | 225 mm | 211 mm |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Controls | Regional Distributors | — |
| Remote control | — | Yes |
