How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ES300 vs Muo

Edifier ES300 vs KEF Muo

What ES300 does better (2) and where Muo wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Edifier ES300
Edifier · 2025ES300
2 advantages
vs
KEF Muo
KEF · 2025Muo
1 advantage≈ $210

Why is ES300 better than Muo?

  1. Output power45 W vs 40 W+12%
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×

Why is Muo better than ES300?

  1. Lowest frequency56 Hz vs 43 Hz+30%
Specifications

Side by side

KEF MuoKEF Muo≈ $210
Sound
Output power45 W40 W
Lowest frequency56 Hz43 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—24 h
Battery powered (portable)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
USB audio—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
AirPlayYes—
Design & build
Weight3,700 g—
Width—82 mm
Height—216 mm
Depth—59 mm
Protection rating—IP67
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx7
Dust protection (IP)—6
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare