vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
ED-S300Rave 3S A31A3012
| ED-S300 | Rave 3S A31A3012 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 204 mm | 504 mm | −300 mm |
| Width | 351 mm | 300 mm | +51 mm |
| Depth | 231 mm | 280 mm | −49 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ED-S300 better than Rave 3S A31A3012?
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
Why is Rave 3S A31A3012 better than ED-S300?
- Output power80 W vs 200 W2.5×
- Lowest frequency48 Hz vs 40 Hz+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver size | 31.8 mm | — |
| Output power | 80 W | 200 W |
| Speaker channels | Stereo | — |
| Lowest frequency | 48 Hz | 40 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Stereo | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 12 h |
| Mains powered | Yes | — |
| Battery powered (portable) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 6,230 g | — |
| Width | 351 mm | 300 mm |
| Height | 204 mm | 504 mm |
| Depth | 231 mm | 280 mm |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
| Party / stereo pairing | — | Yes |
| Light effects | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A1 (3rd Gen)vsEdifier ED-S3008.88.9
vs
Onkyo GX-30ARCvsEdifier ED-S300
vs
Harman-Kardon Aura Studio 5vsEdifier ED-S300
vs
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A1 (3rd Gen)vsSoundcore Rave 3S A31A3012
vs
Onkyo GX-30ARCvsSoundcore Rave 3S A31A3012
vs
Marshall Middleton IIvsSoundcore Rave 3S A31A3012
