vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
ED-S300TOPROCK SYS3 BT20 137 USB-C
| ED-S300 | TOPROCK SYS3 BT20 137 USB-C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 204 mm | 137 mm | +67 mm |
| Width | 351 mm | 396 mm | −45 mm |
| Depth | 231 mm | 296 mm | −65 mm |
| Weight | 6,230 g | 2,800 g | +3,430 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ED-S300 better than TOPROCK SYS3 BT20 137 USB-C?
- Output power80 W vs 20 W4×
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · TOPROCK SYS3 BT20 137 USB-C: No
- LDACYes · TOPROCK SYS3 BT20 137 USB-C: No
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is TOPROCK SYS3 BT20 137 USB-C better than ED-S300?
- Weight6,230 g vs 2,800 g2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver size | 31.8 mm | — |
| Output power | 80 W | 20 W |
| Speaker channels | Stereo | — |
| Lowest frequency | 48 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Mains powered | Yes | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 6,230 g | 2,800 g |
| Width | 351 mm | 396 mm |
| Height | 204 mm | 137 mm |
| Depth | 231 mm | 296 mm |
| Features | ||
| Party / stereo pairing | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A1 (3rd Gen)vsEdifier ED-S3008.88.9
vsOnkyo GX-30ARCvsEdifier ED-S300vs
Edifier ED-S300vsSoundcore Rave 3S A31A3012vs
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A1 (3rd Gen)vsFestool TOPROCK SYS3 BT20 137 USB-CvsOnkyo GX-30ARCvsFestool TOPROCK SYS3 BT20 137 USB-C
vsMarshall Middleton IIvsFestool TOPROCK SYS3 BT20 137 USB-C