Dimensions
Size comparison
ED-S300M90
| ED-S300 | M90 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 204 mm | 212 mm | −8 mm |
| Width | 351 mm | 133 mm | +218 mm |
| Depth | 231 mm | 225 mm | +6 mm |
| Weight | 6,230 g | 6,050 g | +180 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ED-S300 better than M90?
- Lowest frequency48 Hz vs 50 Hz+4%
Why is M90 better than ED-S300?
- Output power80 W vs 100 W+25%
- Driver size31.8 mm vs 101.6 mm3.2×
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
- Weight6,230 g vs 6,050 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver size | 31.8 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Output power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Speaker channels | Stereo | — |
| Lowest frequency | 48 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, SBC | LDAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | — | Yes |
| Optical input | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 6,230 g | 6,050 g |
| Width | 351 mm | 133 mm |
| Height | 204 mm | 212 mm |
| Depth | 231 mm | 225 mm |
| Features | ||
| Controls | — | Regional Distributors |
