Dimensions
Size comparison
ED-QD25Charge 6
| ED-QD25 | Charge 6 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 108 mm | 98.5 mm | +9.5 mm |
| Width | 184 mm | 228.8 mm | −44.8 mm |
| Depth | 95 mm | 94 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 1,020 g | 1,370 g | −350 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ED-QD25 better than Charge 6?
- Weight1,020 g vs 1,370 g+34%
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
Why is Charge 6 better than ED-QD25?
- Battery life15 h vs 28 h+87%
- Output power25 W vs 45 W+80%
- Lowest frequency62 Hz vs 56 Hz+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 25 W | 45 W |
| Speaker channels | — | 2.0 |
| Channel count | — | 2 |
| Lowest frequency | 62 Hz | 56 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Stereo | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | 28 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 4,722 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 2,5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Mains powered | — | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Auracast | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| USB audio | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 1,020 g | 1,370 g |
| Width | 184 mm | 229 mm |
| Height | 108 mm | 98 mm |
| Depth | 95 mm | 94 mm |
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
| Party / stereo pairing | — | Yes |
| Light effects | Yes | — |
