vs
5.4Sound6.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
ED-QD25ULT FIELD 3
| ED-QD25 | ULT FIELD 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 108 mm | 113 mm | −5 mm |
| Width | 184 mm | 256 mm | −72 mm |
| Depth | 95 mm | 79 mm | +16 mm |
| Weight | 1,020 g | 1,200 g | −180 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is ED-QD25 better than ULT FIELD 3?
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- Weight1,020 g vs 1,200 g+18%
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.2+15%
Why is ULT FIELD 3 better than ED-QD25?
- Battery life15 h vs 24 h+60%
- Output power25 W vs 30 W+20%
- Lowest frequency62 Hz vs 20 Hz3.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 25 W | 30 W |
| Lowest frequency | 62 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | 24 h |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Mains powered | — | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 1,020 g | 1,200 g |
| Width | 184 mm | 256 mm |
| Height | 108 mm | 113 mm |
| Depth | 95 mm | 79 mm |
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
| Party / stereo pairing | — | Yes |
| Light effects | Yes | — |
