How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune Pro vs Studio Wireless C

EarFun Tune Pro vs OneOdio Studio Wireless C

What Tune Pro does better (4) and where Studio Wireless C wins (1) — every spec side by side.

EarFun Tune Pro
EarFun · 2025Tune Pro
8.2Score
4 advantages≈ $50
Higher score
vs
OneOdio Studio Wireless C
OneOdio · 2024Studio Wireless C
7.0Score
1 advantage≈ $40
7.0Noise control & calls4.0
9.6Battery9.3

Why is Tune Pro better than Studio Wireless C?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · Studio Wireless C: No
  2. Battery life120 h vs 110 h+9%
  3. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  4. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.2+4%

Why is Studio Wireless C better than Tune Pro?

  1. Driver size40 mm vs 50 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

EarFun Tune ProEarFun Tune Pro≈ $508.2
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm50 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity119 dB—
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones5—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life120 h110 h
Battery life with ANC80 h—
Battery capacity1,100 mAh—
Charging time3 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.2
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight290 g—
FoldableYes—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare