How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune Pro vs TAK5500RT

EarFun Tune Pro vs Philips TAK5500RT

What Tune Pro does better (2) and where TAK5500RT wins (0) — every spec side by side.

EarFun Tune Pro
EarFun · 2025Tune Pro
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $50
Higher score
vs
Philips TAK5500RT
Philips · 2025TAK5500RT
0 advantages≈ $45
6.7Noise control & calls9.2

Why is Tune Pro better than TAK5500RT?

  1. Battery capacity1,100 mAh vs 75 mAh14.7×
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×

Why is TAK5500RT better than Tune Pro?

TAK5500RT has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

EarFun Tune ProEarFun Tune Pro≈ $508.4
Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size40 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω115 Ω
Sensitivity119 dB115 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones5—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life120 h—
Battery life with ANC80 h—
Battery capacity1,100 mAh75 mAh
Charging time3 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.4—
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight290 g—
FoldableYes—
Colours—Green, Blue
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare