Why is Clip better than TAQ2000?
- Battery life10 h vs 7 h+43%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · TAQ2000: No
- Total with charging case40 h vs 28 h+43%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
- LDACYes · TAQ2000: No
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
- Battery capacity60 mAh vs 51 mAh+18%
Why is TAQ2000 better than Clip?
- Driver size10.8 mm vs 12 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10.8 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 100 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 113 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 40 h | 28 h |
| Battery capacity | 60 mAh | 51 mAh |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 48 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.7 g | — |
| Protection rating | IP55 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
