How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OnTrac vs AONIC 50 GEN 2

Dyson OnTrac vs Shure AONIC 50 GEN 2

What OnTrac does better (2) and where AONIC 50 GEN 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Dyson OnTrac
Dyson · 2024OnTrac
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
vs
Shure AONIC 50 GEN 2
Shure · 2023AONIC 50 GEN 2
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $340
7.8Noise control & calls7.8

Why is OnTrac better than AONIC 50 GEN 2?

  1. Battery life55 h vs 45 h+22%
  2. Lowest frequency6 Hz vs 20 Hz3.3×

Why is AONIC 50 GEN 2 better than OnTrac?

  1. Highest frequency21,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Dyson OnTracDyson OnTrac≈ $3208.4
Sound
FitOn-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—50 mm
Lowest frequency6 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency21,000 Hz22,000 Hz
Impedance—39 Ω
Sensitivity—98 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life55 h45 h
Battery life with ANC55 h—
Charging time3 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—Yes
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight—334 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare