How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OnTrac vs Fidelio L4

Dyson OnTrac vs Philips Fidelio L4

What OnTrac does better (3) and where Fidelio L4 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Dyson OnTrac
Dyson · 2024OnTrac
8.4Score
3 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
vs
Philips Fidelio L4
Philips · 2023Fidelio L4
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ $260
7.8Noise control & calls5.8
7.0Battery6.4

Why is OnTrac better than Fidelio L4?

  1. Battery life55 h vs 50 h+10%
  2. Battery life with ANC55 h vs 40 h+38%
  3. Lowest frequency6 Hz vs 7 Hz+17%

Why is Fidelio L4 better than OnTrac?

  1. Highest frequency21,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+90%
  2. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Dyson OnTracDyson OnTrac≈ $3208.4
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency6 Hz7 Hz
Highest frequency21,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—99 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—2
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life55 h50 h
Battery life with ANC55 h40 h
Battery capacity—800 mAh
Charging time3 h2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant
Design & build
Colours—Black
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare