vs
4.0Battery3.3
Why is TWE-48 better than LBT-TWS17CS?
- Battery life6 h vs 5.5 h+9%
Why is LBT-TWS17CS better than TWE-48?
- Charging time6 h vs 1.5 h4×
- Driver size10 mm vs 14.2 mm+42%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Semi-in-ear (open) |
| Ear cup design | — | Semi-open |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 14.2 mm |
| Number of drivers | 4 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 48 Ω | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 5.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 30 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 6 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 3.3 g |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
