Why is TWE-48 better than Comfo C?
- Total with charging case30 h vs 28 h+7%
Why is Comfo C better than TWE-48?
- Battery life6 h vs 7 h+17%
- Charging time6 h vs 1 h6×
- Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 12 mm |
| Number of drivers | 4 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 48 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | — | 90 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 30 h | 28 h |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 6 h | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP56 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx6 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
