How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. PerL Pro vs LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC

Denon PerL Pro vs Sony LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC

What PerL Pro does better (3) and where LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Denon PerL Pro
Denon · 2023PerL Pro
6.4Score
3 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
vs
Sony LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC
4.5Score
3 advantages≈ $210
5.7Battery3.3
2.6Build & features6.2

Why is PerL Pro better than LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 5.5 h+45%
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC: No
  3. aptXYes · LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC: No

Why is LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC better than PerL Pro?

  1. Earbud weight (each)8 g vs 4.1 g+95%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
  3. Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Denon PerL ProDenon PerL Pro≈ $2006.4
Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency40,000 Hz—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h5.5 h
Total with charging case32 h—
Charging time2 h1.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecsaptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)8 g4.1 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare