How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ATH-CKS50TW vs PerL Pro

Audio Technica ATH-CKS50TW vs Denon PerL Pro

What ATH-CKS50TW does better (3) and where PerL Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Audio Technica ATH-CKS50TW
Audio Technica · 2022ATH-CKS50TW
6.4Score
3 advantages≈ $220
vs
Denon PerL Pro
Denon · 2023PerL Pro
6.4Score
4 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
6.2Sound7.0
4.6Noise control & calls5.7
9.0Battery5.7
2.6Build & features2.6

Why is ATH-CKS50TW better than PerL Pro?

  1. Battery life20 h vs 8 h2.5×
  2. Total with charging case50 h vs 32 h+56%
  3. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×

Why is PerL Pro better than ATH-CKS50TW?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · ATH-CKS50TW: Yes
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  3. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
  4. Driver size9 mm vs 10 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Denon PerL ProDenon PerL Pro≈ $2006.4
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size9 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency5 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance20 Ω—
Sensitivity110 dB—
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h8 h
Total with charging case50 h32 h
Charging time3 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—5 min → 1 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Wireless charging (case)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBCaptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXYesYes
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)8 g8 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare