vs
5.7Battery5.5
2.6Build & features6.6
Why is PerL Pro better than AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A: No
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 17,500 Hz2.3×
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 22 Hz+10%
Why is AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A better than PerL Pro?
AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 22 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 17,500 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 17 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 107 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 8 h |
| Total with charging case | 32 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 5 min → 1 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 21 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | 8 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Sony WF-1000XM5vsDenon PerL Pro7.26.4
vs
Denon PerL ProvsTechnics EAH-AZ60M26.46.2
vs
Denon PerL ProvsBang & Olufsen Beocom EX UC6.47.1
vs
Denon PerL ProvsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW6.46.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro SM-R510vsDenon PerL Pro6.56.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsShure AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A5.95.9
