How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. MONDO OVER-EAR ANC vs OnTrac

defunc MONDO OVER-EAR ANC vs Dyson OnTrac

What MONDO OVER-EAR ANC does better (1) and where OnTrac wins (2) — every spec side by side.

defunc MONDO OVER-EAR ANC
defunc · 2026MONDO OVER-EAR ANC
8.6Score
1 advantage≈ $250
Higher score
vs
Dyson OnTrac
Dyson · 2024OnTrac
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $320
7.9Noise control & calls7.9
7.6Battery7.1

Why is MONDO OVER-EAR ANC better than OnTrac?

  1. Charging time1.5 h vs 3 h2×

Why is OnTrac better than MONDO OVER-EAR ANC?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 6 Hz3.3×
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 21,000 Hz+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Dyson OnTracDyson OnTrac≈ $3208.4
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz6 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz21,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity95 dB—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life55 h55 h
Battery life with ANC—55 h
Charging time1.5 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version6—
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Design & build
Weight314 g—
FoldableYes—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare