vs
3.0Noise control & calls3.0
6.9Battery6.7
Why is Die In-Ears better than StereoMan ISI 3?
- Battery life10 h vs 9 h+11%
Why is StereoMan ISI 3 better than Die In-Ears?
- Charging time4 h vs 3 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Impedance | 10 Ω | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 9 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 700 mAh |
| Charging time | 4 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 64 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100vsTechniSat StereoMan ISI 36.54.9
vs
Soundcore Liberty 4 ProvsTechniSat StereoMan ISI 38.94.9
vs
TechniSat StereoMan ISI 3vsHuawei FreeClip 24.98.6
vs
Soundcore Liberty 5vsTechniSat StereoMan ISI 39.14.9
vs
Sony WF-C710NvsTechniSat StereoMan ISI 37.04.9
vs
TechniSat StereoMan ISI 3vsBaseus Eli Sport 14.94.8

