How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. EAH-AZ100 vs StereoMan ISI 3

Technics EAH-AZ100 vs TechniSat StereoMan ISI 3

What EAH-AZ100 does better (2) and where StereoMan ISI 3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics · 2025EAH-AZ100
6.5Score
2 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
TechniSat StereoMan ISI 3
TechniSat · 2024StereoMan ISI 3
4.9Score
1 advantage≈ $50
6.0Noise control & calls3.0
5.6Battery6.7

Why is EAH-AZ100 better than StereoMan ISI 3?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · StereoMan ISI 3: No
  2. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%

Why is StereoMan ISI 3 better than EAH-AZ100?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 9 h+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10 mm—
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency40,000 Hz—
Dolby AtmosYes—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h9 h
Battery life with ANC7 h—
Total with charging case29 h—
Battery capacity—700 mAh
Charging time2 h3 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.3—
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight—64 g
Earbud weight (each)5.9 g—
Protection ratingIPX4—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare