How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Triton 600 Knochenschall-Kopfhörer Bluetooth 6.0, MP3 32GB, IP68 vs Mode USB-C

D-Jix Triton 600 Knochenschall-Kopfhörer Bluetooth 6.0, MP3 32GB, IP68 vs Marshall Mode USB-C

What Triton 600 Knochenschall-Kopfhörer Bluetooth 6.0, MP3 32GB, IP68 does better (2) and where Mode USB-C wins (0) — every spec side by side.

vs
Marshall Mode USB-C
Marshall · 2026Mode USB-C
3.7Score
0 advantages≈ $45
Higher score

Why is Triton 600 Knochenschall-Kopfhörer Bluetooth 6.0, MP3 32GB, IP68 better than Mode USB-C?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx0
  2. Driver size32 mm vs 9 mm3.6×

Why is Mode USB-C better than Triton 600 Knochenschall-Kopfhörer Bluetooth 6.0, MP3 32GB, IP68?

Mode USB-C has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitBone conductionIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size32 mm9 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance220 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity—100 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life15 h—
Charging time2.5 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version6—
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Weight—18 g
Protection ratingIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx0
Dust protection (IP)6—
ColoursBlackBlack
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare