How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Zen Hybrid Gen 2 vs Icon 180

Creative Zen Hybrid Gen 2 vs Skullcandy Icon 180

What Zen Hybrid Gen 2 does better (2) and where Icon 180 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Creative Zen Hybrid Gen 2
Creative · 2025Zen Hybrid Gen 2
8.0Score
2 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
vs
Skullcandy Icon 180
Skullcandy · 2025Icon 180
7.8Score
1 advantage≈ $50
6.6Noise control & calls9.2
7.4Battery6.0
8.1Connectivity6.1

Why is Zen Hybrid Gen 2 better than Icon 180?

  1. Battery life70 h vs 50 h+40%
  2. Driver size40 mm vs 30 mm+33%

Why is Icon 180 better than Zen Hybrid Gen 2?

  1. Weight259 g vs 146 g+77%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size40 mm30 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—109 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life70 h50 h
Battery life with ANC45 h—
Battery capacity500 mAh—
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight259 g146 g
FoldableYes—
Colours—Future, Cement, Crazy Pink, True Black, Bone
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare