How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. BMW M True Wireless Earphones vs TAQ2000

CG Mobile BMW M True Wireless Earphones vs Philips TAQ2000

What BMW M True Wireless Earphones does better (0) and where TAQ2000 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

CG Mobile BMW M True Wireless Earphones
3.5Score
0 advantages≈ $55
vs
Philips TAQ2000
Philips · 2025TAQ2000
4.4Score
4 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
3.1Noise control & calls3.1
2.0Battery4.6

Why is BMW M True Wireless Earphones better than TAQ2000?

BMW M True Wireless Earphones has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAQ2000 better than BMW M True Wireless Earphones?

  1. Battery life4 h vs 7 h+75%
  2. Total with charging case14 h vs 28 h2×
  3. Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.4+6%
  4. Battery capacity30 mAh vs 51 mAh+70%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAQ2000Philips TAQ2000≈ $404.4
Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—12 mm
Lowest frequency—100 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—113 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life4 h7 h
Total with charging case14 h28 h
Battery capacity30 mAh51 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.15.4
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight—48 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare