vs
9.7Battery7.5
Why is earU ER-100PT better than FoKus Prestige Encore?
- Battery life14 h vs 10 h+40%
- Driver size10 mm vs 8 mm+25%
Why is FoKus Prestige Encore better than earU ER-100PT?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · earU ER-100PT: Yes
- LDACNo · earU ER-100PT: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Hybrid |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 18 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 105 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 14 h | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 7 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | LDAC, aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds4 ProvsCasio earU ER-100PT8.47.9
vsKenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsCasio earU ER-100PT8.07.9
vsSennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 5vsCasio earU ER-100PT7.77.9vs
Casio earU ER-100PTvsCasio earU ER-100SH-WY7.97.9
vsCambridge Audio Melomania A100vsCasio earU ER-100PT7.87.9
vs
Noble Audio FoKus Prestige EncorevsEdifier A6