vs
9.6Battery5.6
2.7Build & features7.4
Why is earU ER-100PT better than Svanar Wireless 2?
- Battery life14 h vs 8 h+75%
- aptXYes · Svanar Wireless 2: No
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is Svanar Wireless 2 better than earU ER-100PT?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · earU ER-100PT: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- LDACNo · earU ER-100PT: Yes
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
- Earbud weight (each)8 g vs 7.4 g+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | — | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 35,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 14 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8 g | 7.4 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
