Why is Beatsnake better than ED-MR3?
Beatsnake has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is ED-MR3 better than Beatsnake?
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.4+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Driver size | — | 88.9 mm |
| Output power | — | 36 W |
| Lowest frequency | — | 52 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | — |
| Mains powered | No | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 3,850 g |
| Width | — | 126 mm |
| Height | — | 220 mm |
| Depth | — | 185 mm |
