How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Melomania P100 vs Monitor III ANC

Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 vs Marshall Monitor III ANC

What Melomania P100 does better (4) and where Monitor III ANC wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cambridge Audio Melomania P100
Cambridge Audio · 2024Melomania P100
9.3Score
4 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
vs
Marshall Monitor III ANC
Marshall · 2024Monitor III ANC
7.1Score
2 advantages≈ $270
6.5Noise control & calls7.8
9.2Battery8.2

Why is Melomania P100 better than Monitor III ANC?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Monitor III ANC: No
  2. aptXYes · Monitor III ANC: No
  3. Driver size40 mm vs 32 mm+25%
  4. Charging time2.5 h vs 3 h+20%

Why is Monitor III ANC better than Melomania P100?

  1. Weight330 g vs 250 g+32%
  2. Battery life with ANC60 h vs 70 h+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm32 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—46 Ω
Sensitivity—92 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones6—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life100 h100 h
Battery life with ANC60 h70 h
Charging time2.5 h3 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Wireless charging (case)—No
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Design & build
Weight330 g250 g
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx0
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare