Why is L/R M better than ES300?
- Output power150 W vs 45 W3.3×
- Lowest frequency40 Hz vs 56 Hz+40%
Why is ES300 better than L/R M?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · L/R M: Yes
- Weight6,200 g vs 3,700 g+68%
- LDACNo · L/R M: Yes
- Highest frequency24,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 150 W | 45 W |
| Speaker channels | 2.0 | — |
| Channel count | 2 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 40 Hz | 56 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 24,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Stereo | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | — |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | Yes | — |
| Optical input | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| AirPlay | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 6,200 g | 3,700 g |
| Width | 158 mm | — |
| Height | 263 mm | — |
| Depth | 190 mm | — |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | Yes | — |
