vs
4.8Noise control & calls8.8
3.0Battery4.4
3.6Build & features3.0
Why is Pi5 S2 better than EAH-AZ60M2?
- Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
- aptXYes · EAH-AZ60M2: No
- Earbud weight (each)6 g vs 7 g+17%
- Driver size9.2 mm vs 8 mm+15%
Why is EAH-AZ60M2 better than Pi5 S2?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Pi5 S2: Yes
- Battery life5 h vs 7 h+40%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Pi5 S2: Yes
- LDACNo · Pi5 S2: Yes
- Total with charging case21 h vs 25 h+19%
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 9.2 mm | 8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 8 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 21 h | 25 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Alexa |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6 g | 7 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
