vs
6.2Sound5.8
4.8Noise control & calls8.8
8.9Battery4.4
2.7Build & features3.0
Why is ATH-CKS50TW better than EAH-AZ60M2?
- Battery life20 h vs 7 h2.9×
- Total with charging case50 h vs 25 h2×
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
- aptXYes · EAH-AZ60M2: No
- Driver size9 mm vs 8 mm+12%
Why is EAH-AZ60M2 better than ATH-CKS50TW?
- Active noise cancellingNo · ATH-CKS50TW: Yes
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- LDACNo · ATH-CKS50TW: Yes
- Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
- Earbud weight (each)8 g vs 7 g+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 9 mm | 8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 20 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 8 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 50 h | 25 h |
| Charging time | 3 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Alexa |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8 g | 7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
