vs
3.0Noise control & calls7.2
9.2Battery9.2
Why is DT 30 IE Professioneller In-Ear-Monitor better than HA-A110T?
- Battery life30 h vs 17 h+76%
- Driver size30 mm vs 10 mm3×
Why is HA-A110T better than DT 30 IE Professioneller In-Ear-Monitor?
- Active noise cancellingNo · DT 30 IE Professioneller In-Ear-Monitor: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 30 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 30 h | 17 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 13 h |
| Total with charging case | 30 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 137 mAh | — |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5.7 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Transparent | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods 5vsbeyerdynamic DT 30 IE Professioneller In-Ear-Monitor6.36.5
vsShokz OpenDots Airvsbeyerdynamic DT 30 IE Professioneller In-Ear-Monitor6.46.5
vsFairphone Fairbuds 2vsbeyerdynamic DT 30 IE Professioneller In-Ear-Monitor7.06.5
vsLG xboom Buds Plus by will.i.amvsbeyerdynamic DT 30 IE Professioneller In-Ear-Monitor6.86.5
vs
JVC HA-A110TvsJVC HA-A22T8.07.0
vsRealme Buds Air 8 ProvsJVC HA-A110T8.28.0