vs
6.4Noise control & calls9.2
Why is Aventho 300 better than ALCHEM-E?
- Battery life50 h vs 45 h+11%
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 8 Hz+60%
- Driver size45 mm vs 40 mm+12%
Why is ALCHEM-E better than Aventho 300?
- Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+82%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 45 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 8 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 50 h | 45 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 50 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 319 g | — |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
