vs
9.4Sound8.0
6.4Noise control & calls7.8
6.8Battery4.6
Why is Aventho 300 better than WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo?
- Battery life50 h vs 40 h+25%
- aptXYes · WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo: No
- Charging time2 h vs 3.5 h+75%
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.2+4%
- Driver size45 mm vs 30 mm+50%
Why is WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo better than Aventho 300?
- Weight319 g vs 250 g+28%
- LDACNo · Aventho 300: Yes
- Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+82%
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 4 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 45 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 4 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 50 h | 40 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 50 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 319 g | 250 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
