How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. AMIRON 300 vs WF-1000XM4

beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 vs Sony WF-1000XM4

What AMIRON 300 does better (2) and where WF-1000XM4 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic AMIRON 300
beyerdynamic · 2024AMIRON 300
7.9Score
2 advantages≈ $180
Higher score
vs
Sony WF-1000XM4
Sony · 2021WF-1000XM4
7.6Score
2 advantages≈ $160
8.4Noise control & calls7.2
7.2Battery8.8
5.7Build & features2.9

Why is AMIRON 300 better than WF-1000XM4?

  1. Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%
  2. Earbud weight (each)4.4 g vs 7.3 g+66%

Why is WF-1000XM4 better than AMIRON 300?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 12 h+20%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sony WF-1000XM4Sony WF-1000XM4≈ $1607.6
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency40,000 Hz—
Impedance32 Ω—
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones6—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h12 h
Battery life with ANC7 h—
Total with charging case40 h—
Charging time2 h1.5 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoNo
LDACYesYes
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.4 g7.3 g
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare