How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. AMIRON 300 vs Comfo C

beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 vs Edifier Comfo C

What AMIRON 300 does better (5) and where Comfo C wins (3) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic AMIRON 300
beyerdynamic · 2024AMIRON 300
7.9Score
5 advantages≈ $180
Higher score
vs
Edifier Comfo C
Edifier · 2024Comfo C
3 advantages
7.2Battery4.9

Why is AMIRON 300 better than Comfo C?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 7 h+43%
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Comfo C: No
  3. Total with charging case40 h vs 28 h+43%
  4. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  5. LDACYes · Comfo C: No

Why is Comfo C better than AMIRON 300?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx6+50%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
  3. Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity—90 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones6—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h7 h
Battery life with ANC7 h—
Total with charging case40 h28 h
Charging time2 h1 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.4 g—
Protection ratingIP54IP56
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx6
Dust protection (IP)55
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare